I had originally intended to post this entry last week, but got sidetracked by a murder trial. (If I had a nickel for every time I used that excuse...)
When the pilot for "Studio 60" (NBC, 10 p.m.) came out, I lavished it with praise, and I still stand by that review. The question is, has the show built upon that early promise?
Reviews, like the ratings, have been mixed. I still find "Studio 60" to be generally enjoyable and most of the characters have been pretty well done.
But the show has also been wildly uneven, with characters finding themselves in pretty preposterous situations (trapped on a rooftop, trapped in Utah) that seem to be more lazy writing than genuinely good ideas.
I suppose I am in the minority on some of this, but the relationships on the show haven't really worked either. I don't like the Matt-Harriet stuff and find it rather grating. I do enjoy the Danny-Jordan blossoming romance (except when trapped upon rooftops) but many viewers were turned off by it, feeling that Danny crossed the line into stalker territory. I don't believe that myself - I think the writers were trying to show the lengths Danny was willing to go to in order to woo Jordan - but I can see how viewers might take it the wrong way.
Some of the complaints over the show I find to be a little odd. Some viewers complain about the lack of comedy sketches each week (or that we see only portions of them), even though the show is all about the behind-the-scenes stuff that goes on at a weekly TV series, not the series itself.
Others have criticized co-creator Aaron Sorkin for being to preachy and political with the show. Hello, it's an Aaron Sorkin show, people. When is his series and movies not preachy and political?
The problems with "Studio 60" (which does show flashes of brilliance) are plentiful. The two most interesting characters are the network executives, Jack and Jordan, and they both spend way too much time with this one particular show on the network. In reality, Jack and Jordan might bump into Matt and Danny once a year, and they'd never spend so much time rubbing elbows with the cast.
I find the character of Harriet to be rather shrill and irritating, and we keep getting told of Matt's writing genius, though rarely we are shown it. (Not to mention the fact that they are trying to produce a weekly variety show with just four writers, two of whom have yet to contribute a sketch).
Bradley Whitford, Matthew Perry and D.L. Hughley have all been underused in comparison to their relative talents, as has Amanda Peet, whose Jordan McDeere character showed so much promise in the pilot. We only see brief bursts of the potential all of these characters have as played by these talented actors.
Only Tom (Nate Corddry) has really fulfilled his potential as a character, though the current storyline of his breaking a date with Lucy to chaperone the daughter of a Chinese industrialist fell into the worst kind of sitcom plotline. Jack (Steven Weber) has been the character that has improved the most (and has become my favorite), but it almost seems like he should be in a different show. Also, the recent addition of Mark McKinney as one of the fictional show's writers was a positive addition.
The ratings have been a disappointment for the most part (especially with the smash hit "Heroes" preceding it), and the critics have indulged in their own schadenfreude at the prospect of a Sorkin show failing so early on. NBC will pull "Studio 60" next month temporarily in favor of "The Black Donnellys," a crime drama from two-time Oscar winner Paul Haggis, arguably the top screenwriter in Hollywood currently.
Hopefully, the time off will allow the writers of "Studio 60" to get their sea legs back. There is still time to right the ship.
MONDAY'S BEST BETS: Tonight, we get a double helping of "24" (Fox, 8 p.m.) You know what that means - Tuesday's blog will have double the amount of "24" Bizarro facts in it! In tonight's episode, Jack will no doubt have to shoot and maim a lot of people to rescue Morris from terrorists before he is forced to arm the remaining nukes.
"Heroes" (NBC, 9 p.m.) continues with last week's fallout of revealing who Claire's real father is, and another superpowered person is revealed tonight. So far, the additions of Christopher Eccleston and Jessalyn Gilsig have been positive ones, so I'm just going to continue enjoy the ride.
CBS has a lineup of new episodes of its comedies, beginning with "How I Met Your Mother" at 8 p.m. in what is easily TV's most improved show from Season 1 to Season 2.
And, just so as not to draw criticism, "What About Brian" (ABC, 10 p.m.) is new tonight, and preceded by two reality shows that don't really deserve mention.
Monday, February 12, 2007
Studio 60: Good, Bad or Indifferent?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
6 comments:
Well, I disagree with you, too. "HIMYM" was pretty uneven its first season, with the whole Ted-and-Robin will-they-or-won't-they dynamic. It's really hit its stride this season.
I think Supernatural has stayed pretty even, probably the most of any of the shows. I've discussed Bones at length here before, and I think Earl has also shown a lot of improvement its 2nd season. The "Cops" and "Rashomon" parodies it did this season were terrific, and it's hit a lot of high points.
I agree that Danny's efforts on S60 were not stalking but certainly overzealous. I think last week's episode did a good job putting that issue to bed.
Watch tonight's episode - if you liked the pilot, you'll find yourself appreciating where the show is going this evening. Yes, it builds on everything that's happened between the pilot and now. But I think the promises made by Sorkin in the pilot are finally coming to fruition.
And if I wanted to watch comedy sketches, I'd watch Saturday Night Live (oh wait, I've tried that - their sketches aren't half as good as the ones Sorkin DID have on before critics started tearing him down).
Honestly, the show is improving drastically each week. If more critics would be as fair minded as you are, and not play the game of "it's hip to hate Studio 60", I think the show would do well. Tonight's episode is a terrific leap forward and it would be criminal for people to not watch it.
Thanks for the kind words, thawtful.
I'm jealous you've gotten to see the episode already!
I should re-iterate that I'm still a huge Sorkin fan and I do believe that given half a chance, Studio 60 can still live up to the promise it continues to show. There have been good moments all season and flashes of brilliance (the New Orleans Christmas episode leaps to mind).
I still look forward to it coming on each week, which is still a good sign for the show.
1st thing- I had to resign up AGAIN for my user login. Is this how it works, I have to resign up each week? Just asking on that one.
2nd thing- I did like Studio 60, I watched like the first 5-6 episodes (recorded on DVR). But found myself not having time to watch it, I'm already commited to several shows that I have a hard enough time keeping up with. This just added another. It was good, but not so good that I keep it on my DVR list. I just had to give up on it.
3rd thing- I know you wonder why so my people watch shows like AI and other reality type stuff. Well I'll tell you why. You don't have to be invested in it. You can watch one show, then two or three weeks later you can pick it up with out missing out on two much (besides maybe who got kicked out). With our lives as busy as they are, it takes everything I have to watch every week my fav shows like 24, Lost, FNL, ect... Even comedy's you have to keep up with now like Ugly Betty. So sometimes it's nice to just turn on the tube, tune into a channel, and pick up what's going on without alot of effert.
Just my two cents...
Edge, I believe this should be the last time this happens. They made me switch from Old Blogger to New Blogger, which is why you might have had the problem. Let me know how it works out.
You bring up a good point as how serialized shows like Studio 60, 24, Lost, Heroes, even the Office, can be tough to track. If you miss one episode, it's very difficult to catch up.
With AI, you are correct, you could miss an episode here or there, though I'd argue that it would be harder with a reality show like Survivor or Amazing Race.
I'd agree also that it's tough to keep up with all of the options offered on TV and that today's dramas are very challenging, but I think that's a great thing.
Zodster,
My main argument with Bones is how they've brought in Sorayan, essentially a pointless character since she is very similar to Brennan. Actually, she hurts the show in a sense (the character, not the actress) because she puts a wedge in between the Brennan-Booth chemistry and duplicates the role Brennan has in the show. I liked all of the other characters already, so there was no improvement in that sense.
If people want to watch the reality shows, more power to them. Not my cup of tea, certainly, but it's foolish to deny there's not an audience there. And AI, for all its faults, has launched a number of musical careers for both its winners and runners up. Whether or not you are a fan of their music, a lot of singers have done quite well because of the show, which is its raison d'etre.
Post a Comment